h-entry-feedback: Difference between revisions

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(dump of resolved classname issues from mf2 page)
 
(move past resolved issues from feedback page to issues page, redirect this page to issues page to simplify)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Resolved Issues ==
#redirect:[[h-entry-issues]]
 
* 2012-245 Resolved. See [http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/microformats/20120830#l-120 2012-243 IRC discussion/consensus] for:
** Use '''<code>p-summary</code> instead of <code>p-entry-summary</code>'''. The historical semantic of "entry-summary" is not different from "summary" in any significant (or discernible way). Collapsing the two will simplify the overall microformats2 vocabularies further. In microformats2, entry-summary is no more.
** Use '''<code>e-content</code> instead of <code>e-entry-content</code>'''. Same point and advantage. In microformats2, entry-content is no more.
** '''drop <code>p-entry-title</code>'''. Unnecessary and subsumed by "p-name". Would consider move to backward compat only if cases are presented - known publishing uses are expected to be updated shortly.

Latest revision as of 11:48, 5 August 2016

Redirect to: