namespaces-considered-harmful

From Microformats Wiki
namespaces-considered-harmful /
Revision as of 19:24, 22 July 2006 by Tantek (talk | contribs) (first draft)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

namespaces considered harmful

(This article is a stub, feel free to expand upon it)

The mixed namespace approach has already been tried by *numerous* others since 1998 and has failed on the Web.

http://blog.davidjanes.com/mtarchives/2005_10.html#003410

OTOH, XHTML + semantic class names has seen widespread adoption among the web authoring/design/IA/publishing community. Microformats is leveraging the approach that is both working better and frankly dominating in practice on the Web.

http://microformats.org/blog/2006/01/09/tim-bray-on-creating-xml-dialects/

Namespaces are actually a *huge* negative. Search for:

Namespaces are actually *not* well supported in sufficient modern browsers, nor even sufficiently with enough W3C technologies or test suites as compared to (X)HTML + semantic class names + CSS.

See Also