Difference between revisions of "process-issues"

From Microformats Wiki
process-issues
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (decap; grammar fixes; accessibity)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
=== 2007 ===
 
=== 2007 ===
* {{OpenIssue}} 2007-09-07 raised by Manu Sporny
+
* {{OpenIssue}} 2007-09-07 raised by [http://wiki.digitalbazaar.com/en/Haudio-case-study#Problems_Encountered_with_Microformats Manu Sporny]
*# ''Issue 1: http://wiki.digitalbazaar.com/en/Haudio-case-study#Problems_Encountered_with_Microformats''
+
*# Issue 1: What constitutes "Enough Examples"
 +
*# Issue 2: Proper interpretation of W3C standards
 +
*# Issue 3: Keeping up with changes to the process becomes frustrating
  
 
== Template ==
 
== Template ==

Revision as of 00:50, 8 September 2007

process issues

These are issues that have been raised about the microformats The microformats process with broadly varying degrees of merit. Thus some issues are rejected for a number of obvious reasons (but still documented here in case they are re-raised), and others contain longer discussions. Some issues may be accepted and perhaps cause changes or improved explanations in the spec.

Important: Please read the process FAQ before giving any feedback or raising any issues as your feedback/issues may already be resolved/answered.

Submitted issues may (and probably will) be edited and rewritten for better terseness, clarity, calmness, rationality, and as neutral a point of view as possible. Write your issues well.

Closed Issues

Resolved issues that have no further actions to take. These will likely be moved to a separate page like Closed Process Issues.

  • none yet.

Resolved Issues

Issues that are resolved, but may have outstanding To Do items. As issues are resolved, they will be moved from the top of the issues list to the bottom of this section.

  • none yet.

Issues

Please add new issues to the bottom of the list by copying and pasting the template. Please follow-up resolved or rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted.

2007

  • open issue! 2007-09-07 raised by Manu Sporny
    1. Issue 1: What constitutes "Enough Examples"
    2. Issue 2: Proper interpretation of W3C standards
    3. Issue 3: Keeping up with changes to the process becomes frustrating

Template

Please use this format (copy and paste this to the end of the list to add your issues):

  • open issue! YYYY-MM-DD raised by YOURNAME.
    1. Issue 1: Here is the first issue I have.
    2. Issue 2: Here is the second issue I have.

Related Pages