wiki-feedback-fr

Qu'est-ce que c'est que ça ?

Nous rassemblons ici les réactions sur l'utilisabilité et l'organisation du wiki.

Que puis-je faire ici ?

• Vous plaindre sur la manière dont le wiki est difficile à utiliser. (Faites un article si possible.)
• Ajouter des suggestions concernant le contenu, l'organisation et l'utilisabilité de la liste des choses à faire sur l'architecture de l'information. (Ajoutez votre propre sujet si nécessaire.)
• Etre d'accord sur le fait que vous avez aussi un problème pour trouver quelque chose sur le wiki.
• Chercher sur les Archives de la Liste de Discussion sur
  • confused
  • trouble
  • confusion
  • help

et postez vos résultats ici.

Reproches :

• Internationalisation pauvre : We should not assume that all publishing is done in English. Andy Mabbett 11:32, 10 Mar 2007 (PST)
• Roger was wondering how fn and org work together, and didn't see the relevant section in the hCard spec.
  • See Organization Contact Info in the spec, and The Importance of Names in hcard-authoring. I recommend this be added to hcard-faq. Tantek 17:54, 16 Oct 2006 (PDT)
  • Once I pointed out the first reference, he wondered why he missed it. Nonetheless, missed it he did. How should we highlight recommendations/suggestions? BenWest 21:44, 16 Oct 2006 (PDT)
• Justin says: I didn't even see that there was a page on authoring within the pages and pages of specification. Even with it at the top of the page. I glanced right over it. It seems like most tutorials on hCard or hCalendar point people to the spec to get more information. Should we be encouraging people to point to the authoring page? I think a newbie would be very very very intimidated being pointed right to the spec.

I agree with this. Perhaps a more friendly intro page could be constructed to introduce hCard and link to the various resources. Ashley 14:31, 16 Oct 2006 (PDT)

• I can't find any useful information about marking up a key in the wiki. Perhaps someone could include some examples? Ashley 14:31, 16 Oct 2006 (PDT)
  • Ashley, what do you mean by a "key"? Tantek 17:54, 16 Oct 2006 (PDT)
    • Er, hCard "key". I just found it though. I'm becoming increasingly proficient at opening my mouth before I know what I'm talking about around here, sorry.
• Andy Mabbett tells of his co-worker: "She was baffled by hCalendar; not least because, though the page had an irrelevant and misleading treatise on 'Semantic XHTML Design Principles', it didn't list the hCalendar fields, let alone say which are mandatory and which are optional!" He started such a list, but his edit was soon reverted. BenWest 15:11, 16 Oct 2006 (PDT)
  • Agreed that hCalendar needs to list the properties/sub-properties. Added to my to-do list. Tantek 17:54, 16 Oct 2006 (PDT)
• This suggestion http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-October/006101.html and many other proposals like it aren't being captured on the wiki. This means we are doomed to discuss rejected microformats again and again. Maybe we can have a gallery of ideas and their status (both ongoing and dead)... BenWest 15:11, 16 Oct 2006 (PDT)
• Mike Schinkel says in a recent email to the list: -- (Nothing I could find on Microformats.org is explicit in defining "goals") -- (If would be good if there were a consensus, or at least if we were all aware.) BenWest 21:19, 16 Oct 2006 (PDT)

Comment cela Fonctionne ?

La liste enregistre au-dessus les reproches. Après avoir été résolus et confirmés, nous pouvons nous battre et après quelque temps quand il sera clair que les problèmes ont été résolus, nous pourrons les retirer complètement. Peut-être s'il existe une suggestion, elle devrait être mise en valeur et nous devriosn en prendre soin pour nous assurer qu'elle sera migrée sur la liste des choses à faire.