[uf-dev] Human and machine readable data format
Toby A Inkster
mail at tobyinkster.co.uk
Sat Jul 5 13:17:34 PDT 2008
Glenn Jones wrote:
> http://ufxtract.com/experimental/hm-readable-date.htm
A problem which hasn't been raised with regards to this proposal is
that even though you are proposing a fixed date format, because it
*looks* like natural language, authors will assume that it *is*
natural language, and simply start including dates in whatever format
they like. Then you get an NLP "arms race" between publishers and
parsers.
If you don't believe that that will happen, take a look at what
happened with RFC 822 dates, which are simply a mess.
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail at tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
More information about the microformats-dev
mailing list