[microformats-discuss] Evaulating RSS per the microformats
solitude at solitude.dk
Sun Aug 14 15:19:35 PDT 2005
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:03:33 +0200, Alf Eaton <alf at hubmed.org> wrote:
>> But I can't use that RSS archive for anything. I can't read it (or I'll
>> have to add it to a subscription list to read it just once). I can't
>> link to it. For it to be usable as an archive format RSS readers will
>> have to reinvent every aspect of the webbrowser - with an added RSS
>> wrapper. That's more tha a little silly.
> There's already an HTML version for you to read in your browser , but
> the XML version of a single post (RSS in this case ) is still a great
> place to store metadata - and of course you can link to it (and so can
> the HTML page, and vice versa). Remember Ken MacLeod's "Is a feed the
> right place for your data?" : Blosxom can make different versions of
> each post easily, based on templates, and so can Movable Type - RDF for
> example . Once the Atom Publishing Protocol is in place, each post
> will have a version in Atom too.
Why is that RSS (both XHTML and RSS are XML) document a good place to
store metadata? Why create a new copy if it doesn't give me more than what
I already can have?
With HTML I can link to individual entries. That's the power of
permalinks. I can't do that in RSS. Well, I could if I created RSS
documents with only one item and someone created an "RSS browser". But
then I'd have to reinvent the whole web using a different flavour of XML
than the one that has ten years of developement behind it.
The way I see it I have two options. I can either create *another* copy of
my content, or I can add a little bit of extra metadata in the content I
already have (using a microformat). I cannot see why someone would even
consider using RSS over HTML as their archive format.
>  http://mike.teczno.com/notes/podcasting.html
>  http://mike.teczno.com/notes/podcasting.rss
>  http://bitsko.slc.ut.us/blog/feed-data.html
>  http://hublog.hubmed.org/archives/001142.html
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
More information about the microformats-discuss