[microformats-discuss] Evaulating RSS per the microformats
principles.
Michal Migurski
mike at stamen.com
Sun Aug 14 18:56:28 PDT 2005
>> There's already an HTML version for you to read in your browser
>> [1], but the XML version of a single post (RSS in this case [2])
>> is still a great place to store metadata
>
> Really? A better place than in HTML?
Maybe, maybe not - it depends. There's a *ton* of momentum behind
serializing periodic content into RSS/Atom/whatever, from podcasts to
native OS-level support (see below), so arguing for yet another blog
post standard feels somewhat futile to me.
HOWEVER, I did mention earlier that what was definitely missing from
blogs in general was any sort of conversation semantics. I don't see
a mention of this on blog-post-brainstorming[1] or blog-description-
format[2], but this seems like a necessity for blog-based, inter-site
conversation.
[1] http://microformats.org/wiki/blog-post-brainstorming
[2] http://microformats.org/wiki/blog-description-format
Mail & news both have the In-Reply-To header, whose value looks like
an address. Can a blog post microformat be as simple as this?
<div class="blog-post">
<h3 class="title">title of post</h3>
<p class="content">
<a href="http://example.org/musings" rel="in-reply-to">John
Doe muses</a> about a topic of interest. I however vehemently
disagree, for many reasons.
</p>
<a href="http://example.com/ramblings" rel="permanent-
link">permanent link</a>.
</div>
>> - and of course you can link to it (and so can the HTML page, and
>> vice versa).
>
> But can you view it in your browser? Can it be styled in your browser?
Sort of.
Safari's RSS view:
http://www.winsupersite.com/images/reviews/tiger_09.jpg
IE7's version of same:
http://bink.nu/photos/news_article_images/picture9241.aspx
On applying CSS to RSS:
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2005/07/01/rss.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
michal migurski- mike at stamen.com
415.558.1610
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list