[microformats-discuss] re: Microformat for timestamp of updated
content
David Janes -- BlogMatrix
davidjanes at blogmatrix.com
Fri Aug 19 03:23:25 PDT 2005
Just out of curiosity -- in places where I'm seeing <abbr
title="FORMAL-VALUE">INFORMAL-VALUE</abbr>, would we also
accept/generate using the <span> or some other HTML element. I.e. I'm
wondering why <abbr> is always being used when "title" is available on
all HTML elements [1].
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd.html#coreattrs
Regards, etc...
David
Tantek Çelik wrote:
> On 8/17/05 12:15 PM, "Bryan J Busch" <bryanjbusch at gmail.com> wrote:
>>If the date representation is left out of the standard, then are we
>>talking something like:
>>
>><abbr class="last-modified" title="[unknown date/time
>>format]">[unknown date/time format]</abbr>
>
>
> Not quite. He literally meant *between* <abbr> and </abbr>, e.g. in your
> words:
>
> <abbr class="last-modified" title="[ISO8601 datetime]">
> [unknown date/time format]
> </abbr>
>
> Tantek
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list