[uf-discuss] RFC: Proposal for general purpose microformat
scott at randomchaos.com
Fri Dec 2 12:14:15 PST 2005
Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> I feel a subtle hostility wrt this improvement attempt, I'm wrong?
I suspect many here are tired of fending off attempt after attempt at
generalization, as such attempts tend to come at a cost of simplicity
(and therefor adoption).
Less than a month ago , Tantek wrote:
> microformats are not:
> * infinitely extensible and open-ended
> * a panacea for all taxonomies, ontologies, and other such
> * defining the whole world, or even just boiling the ocean
> So yes, such "general purpose" or "universality" is an explicit NON-
You can read through the archives for a few dozen explanations of
More information about the microformats-discuss