[uf-discuss] RFC: Proposal for general purpose microformat
Abramo Bagnara
abramobagnara at tin.it
Fri Dec 2 13:18:10 PST 2005
Scott Reynen ha scritto:
> Abramo Bagnara wrote:
>
>> I feel a subtle hostility wrt this improvement attempt, I'm wrong?
>
>
> I suspect many here are tired of fending off attempt after attempt at
> generalization, as such attempts tend to come at a cost of simplicity
> (and therefor adoption).
About simplicity I guess that a rather reliable way to measure it is to
compare stylesheet needed for data extraction.
> Less than a month ago [1], Tantek wrote:
>
>> microformats are not:
>> * infinitely extensible and open-ended
>> * a panacea for all taxonomies, ontologies, and other such
>> abstractions
>> * defining the whole world, or even just boiling the ocean
>>
>> So yes, such "general purpose" or "universality" is an explicit NON-
>> goal.
>
>
> You can read through the archives for a few dozen explanations of this
> perspective.
I think that "general purpose" and "universality" sacrificing simplicity
is a bad thing, but can we agree that universality *with* simplicity is
a benefit?
--
Abramo Bagnara mailto:abramobagnara at tin.it
Opera Unica Phone: +39.0546.656023
Via Emilia Interna, 140
48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list