[uf-discuss] hAtom draft - utility of feeds
John Panzer
jpanzer at aol.net
Wed Dec 28 14:09:32 PST 2005
Mark Pilgrim wrote on 12/28/2005, 1:57 PM:
> On 12/28/05, David Janes -- BlogMatrix <davidjanes at blogmatrix.com> wrote:
> > Although not covered explicitly in the examples, my latest thought
> is to
> > allow a Feed element to be embedded in an Entry element. Why? To
> model a
> > comment feed, which obviously is blog like content.
>
> I plan to implement it in feedparser.py when it's done, so I am
> intensely interested in a few crucial design decisions. You've been
> doing pretty well with hAtom so far, so I've stayed
> uncharacteristically quiet. But now you're just making shit up, and
> that's dangerous.
>
> hAtom is a derivative format, like hCard is derivative of vCard. The
> Atom format has been endlessly argued and finally codified and RFC'd.
> Now you're trying to find an elegant way to backport it to HTML, which
> I fully support. But please resist the temptation to invent new
> things.
>
> The Atom community already had this particular argument; nested feeds
> lost.
>
Yes. Although entry content at src="http://example.org/comments/feed/1138"
is allowed by the Atom 1.0 spec. How does content at src get translated in
hAtom? (The Wiki doesn't give any details on this.)
<a href="http://example.org/comments/feed/1138"
class="content">Comments</a> wouldn't exactly match the intent of
content at src, which is intended to imply inline processing. But maybe
that's a nitpick.
--
John Panzer
http://journals.aol.com/panzerjohn/abstractioneer
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list