[uf-discuss] Standardised list of plural properties

[Edward O'Connor]

> Wouldn't it be simpler to parse under the assumption that any  
> property could potentially be plural

Sure.

> and ignore all but the first instance as makes sense in a given
> context?

Well, perhaps (mapconcat 'identity thingies " ") instead. That is to
say, concatenate the string descendants of all things FOO to obtain the
singular property FOO.


Ted

-- 
Edward O'Connor
hober0 at gmail.com

Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.