[uf-discuss] Standardised list of plural properties

Edward O'Connor hober0 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 4 15:45:28 PST 2005

> Wouldn't it be simpler to parse under the assumption that any  
> property could potentially be plural


> and ignore all but the first instance as makes sense in a given
> context?

Well, perhaps (mapconcat 'identity thingies " ") instead. That is to
say, concatenate the string descendants of all things FOO to obtain the
singular property FOO.


Edward O'Connor
hober0 at gmail.com

Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list