[uf-discuss] invisible metadata
Andy Hume
andyhume at thedredge.org
Sat Nov 19 05:42:12 PST 2005
Hi
>>> As said before, microformats encourage the use of *visible data*,
>>> not
>>> invisible (meta)data, and thus microformats agrees with the
>>> position that
>>> you should NOT use CSS to hide microformatted content.
>>
>> This is a concept I hadn't heard voiced before, and I guess I agree
>> in principle.
>
> Yes, this is a *very* important aspect of microformats.
>
>> However, microformats could be powerful tool for marking up invisible
>> meta data.
>
> The problem is that invisible metadata is nearly worthless.
It's not quite as simple as that, surely? Invisible metadata
shouldn't be worthless, although I do understand the arguments
against hiding it.
<a href="http://myfriend.com" rel="friend met colleague">Mr Bloggs</a>
These XFN values are essentially invisible to humans when rendered by
a browser. Explain how this is different to hiding something with CSS.
Apologies if I'm going over old ground here.
> See previous
> writings on this re: meta keywords etc.
Very interesting, and I understand the parallels with meta keyword
values, etc. I *have* taken this on board, however my question above
still stands.
Cheers,
Andy.
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list