[uf-discuss] invisible metadata
andyhume at thedredge.org
Sat Nov 19 05:42:12 PST 2005
>>> As said before, microformats encourage the use of *visible data*,
>>> invisible (meta)data, and thus microformats agrees with the
>>> position that
>>> you should NOT use CSS to hide microformatted content.
>> This is a concept I hadn't heard voiced before, and I guess I agree
>> in principle.
> Yes, this is a *very* important aspect of microformats.
>> However, microformats could be powerful tool for marking up invisible
>> meta data.
> The problem is that invisible metadata is nearly worthless.
It's not quite as simple as that, surely? Invisible metadata
shouldn't be worthless, although I do understand the arguments
against hiding it.
<a href="http://myfriend.com" rel="friend met colleague">Mr Bloggs</a>
These XFN values are essentially invisible to humans when rendered by
a browser. Explain how this is different to hiding something with CSS.
Apologies if I'm going over old ground here.
> See previous
> writings on this re: meta keywords etc.
Very interesting, and I understand the parallels with meta keyword
values, etc. I *have* taken this on board, however my question above
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
More information about the microformats-discuss