[microformats-discuss] RFC: Thoughts on Video and Audio
Charles Iliya Krempeaux
supercanadian at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 10:59:31 PDT 2005
On 10/18/05, David Janes -- BlogMatrix <davidjanes at blogmatrix.com> wrote:
> Hi Charles,
> XHTML (based on HTML 4.01) compliance is considered a MUST  here in
> the microformats community. "rel" and "rev" may fly (I haven't looked
> too closely) but "urn" is toast .
You are quite right. I should have actually looked at the newer HTML
spec. (Instead of non-authoritative sources.)
> My XHTML compliance checking is quite functionally based on .
> Regards, etc...
>  upper-case MUST in the RFC sense, not the I'm yelling at you sense
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/links.html#edef-A
>  http://validator.w3.org/
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
charles @ reptile.ca
supercanadian @ gmail.com
developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
Never forget where you came from
More information about the microformats-discuss