[uf-discuss] WordPress and hAtom: Just for themers?
kmarks at technorati.com
Tue Aug 8 14:01:32 PDT 2006
On Aug 8, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
> That prompts me to ask a follow up question: why isn't hAtom intended
> to replace RSS or Atom? Is it the increased bandwidth required for
> all the extraneous information in a given XHTML document, or the loss
> of semantics from Atom to hAtom, or is there something more
> fundamental I'm missing?
Because stupid format wars are just the kind of rathole we set up
microformats.org to avoid.
More information about the microformats-discuss