[uf-discuss] WordPress and hAtom: Just for themers?

Kevin Marks kmarks at technorati.com
Tue Aug 8 14:01:32 PDT 2006

On Aug 8, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
> That prompts me to ask a follow up question: why isn't hAtom intended 
> to replace RSS or Atom?  Is it the increased bandwidth required for 
> all the extraneous information in a given XHTML document, or the loss 
> of semantics from Atom to hAtom, or is there something more 
> fundamental I'm missing?

Because stupid format wars are just the kind of rathole we set up 
microformats.org to avoid.

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list