[uf-discuss] Unambiguous class names

David Janes davidjanes at blogmatrix.com
Sat Dec 9 07:48:27 PST 2006

On 12/9/06, Brian Suda <brian.suda at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/9/06, David Janes <davidjanes at blogmatrix.com> wrote:
> > > > 3. Is this documented somewhere or is it something that everyone is
> > > > supposed to know (or am I just wrong)?
> > >
> > > --- is what documented? the fact that property values are the same
> > > across all microformats? or the values for the citation format?
> >
> > The latter. I though that "but" and ellipses from point 2 leading into
> > point 3 made this clear.
> --- sorry, i missed that. But i think i am still confused :) it's too
> early for me. In regards to latter (the citation microformats), the
> best documentation at the moment is here[1], but that is purely a
> brainstormed-straw-proposal, there are several things wrong with it
> and much it is still trying to be flushed out or is out-right
> incorrect - so don't consider it anywhere ready to be a draft - and
> therefore any of those properties shouldn't be spread around the rest
> of the wiki because they are more than like to be
> reduced/added/changed.

Sorry, now it's _my_ bad. I meant the former (all microformats).
Reseting the conversation to it's most basic:

Is this a true or false statement? class names should have an
unambiguous meaning across all microformats.

Regards, etc...

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list