[uf-discuss] Unambiguous class names
brian.suda at gmail.com
Sat Dec 9 07:32:25 PST 2006
On 12/9/06, David Janes <davidjanes at blogmatrix.com> wrote:
> > > 3. Is this documented somewhere or is it something that everyone is
> > > supposed to know (or am I just wrong)?
> > --- is what documented? the fact that property values are the same
> > across all microformats? or the values for the citation format?
> The latter. I though that "but" and ellipses from point 2 leading into
> point 3 made this clear.
--- sorry, i missed that. But i think i am still confused :) it's too
early for me. In regards to latter (the citation microformats), the
best documentation at the moment is here, but that is purely a
brainstormed-straw-proposal, there are several things wrong with it
and much it is still trying to be flushed out or is out-right
incorrect - so don't consider it anywhere ready to be a draft - and
therefore any of those properties shouldn't be spread around the rest
of the wiki because they are more than like to be
> > > 4. If my assumption is correct, should I note it in a few pages;
> > --- i'm not sure what your assumption is? the citation format is still
> > being mashed out - so the property values should not be taken as
> > final.
> As per the previous point regarding property values across all microformats.
well, i certainly wouldn't add anything here:
This just talks about the class-design-patter
so i don't think that would be the best place to say that properties
are universal across all formats.
I'm not sure about how or where to add a "no namespace, so all
property names are universal" discussion to the process page?
I'll leave that up to others to discuss where that best belongs - i
thought we had a page(s) that talked about it, maybe they just need to
be linked-to or made more prominent?
 - http://microformats.org/wiki/citation-brainstorming#Brian.27s_Straw_format
More information about the microformats-discuss