URI profiles [was RE: [uf-discuss] Comments from IBM/Lotus
rep about Microformats]
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Fri Dec 15 01:12:52 PST 2006
In message <905f7c910612141639l1fc6a3ffu658e93d8f311b30 at mail.gmail.com>,
Elias Torres <elias at torrez.us> writes
>> >> 2) Rather than having a profile for each uF (and, presumably,
>> >> near-duplicate profiles for nested uFs such as geo or adr in hCard?) why
>> >> not have one over-arching profile for all microformats?
>> >Funny you say that since it's one of the biggest misconception of
>> >Semantic Web ideas. That SW seeks to find a single ontology for all of
>> >the data in the world. bleech.
>> Were I suggesting what you seem to think I'm suggesting, your "bleech"
>> would be appropriate.
>I'm glad we are in sync then :) What were you really suggesting?
One over-arching profile for all microformats.
* Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
* Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
* Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
More information about the microformats-discuss