[uf-discuss] hReview feedback
paul at msn.com
Thu Jan 12 22:02:34 PST 2006
"Scott Reynen" wrote...
> Paul Bryson wrote:
>> On the topic of hReview, I think it works really well with one
>> The "Rating" system seems woefully inadequete. I guess 1-5 is a common
>> case, but certainly not 80%. There should be a machine readable way to
>> the upper and lower bounds of the rating.
> There is.
> "The rating is an integer from 1 to 5 inclusive indicating a rating for
> the item, higher indicating a better rating. Optionally a different
> integral "worst" value and/or "best" value MAY be specified (e.g. 6 from
To clarify, there should be a better way. Specifically, a better way to
mark the lower bound. I can't think that I've ever seen a review that tells
you if the lower bound is 1 or 0. So, how do you provide that information
without looking silly?
The currently used date-pattern allows the entire date/time including
timezone to be provided, all without overwhelming the reader. I would like
to see a similar method.
- who thinks he should start reading all conversations before posting.
More information about the microformats-discuss