[uf-discuss] hReview feedback
Ryan King
ryan at technorati.com
Fri Jan 13 01:18:49 PST 2006
On Jan 12, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Paul Bryson wrote:
> On the topic of hReview, I think it works really well with one
> exception.
> The "Rating" system seems woefully inadequete. I guess 1-5 is a
> common
> case, but certainly not 80%. There should be a machine readable
> way to mark
> the upper and lower bounds of the rating.
There is. Please read http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview again.
-rk
> Possibly something like the
> <abbr/> system being used for dates.
>
> <abbr class="rating" title="4/5 from 1">4</abbr>
>
> I have a feeling there is a mathematical way to express a
> statistical amount
> and range like this, but I can't think of what it is. I went ahead
> and
> asked in a statistics group if anyone is interested.
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.stat.math/browse_thread/thread/
> ea14ad02962ae783/5c152b82929afd71#5c152b82929afd71
>
>
> Atamido
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
--
Ryan King
ryan at technorati.com
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list