[uf-discuss] hReview feedback
paul at msn.com
Wed Jan 18 10:13:29 PST 2006
"Ryan King" wrote...
> On Jan 17, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Paul Bryson wrote:
>> A good portion of the numerical ratings on the internet are aggregates
>> many people voting, usually without their own detailed reviews, so
>> getting a
>> float value for the rating would be pretty likely.
> I think this missed the point. Its those individual votes which are
> candidates for hreview, not the aggregate data.
I would have thought that they would both be canidates. One is as common as
the other, and there is so much overlap that it seems wasteful to me to
ignore aggregate data.
> In my opinion, programming language syntax is not the same as "what
> people do on the web." To have a more productive discussion here, lets
> focus on "what do people do, on the web, to denote the range of the
> rating in their reviews?"
There are several real world examples already collected on the wiki, as well
as ones I already posted to the mailing list. I was now trying to establish
"what previous standards are people actually using today", which as I've
already stated appear to be limited to statistical and (apparently)
programming standards. Of course, if you don't want to talk about how
professionals have been doing it for hundreds of years...
More information about the microformats-discuss