[uf-discuss] FACE and microformats?
Stephen Paul Weber
singpolyma at gmail.com
Tue Jun 13 05:02:14 PDT 2006
>>My question to you fine people is: are there any good reasons why I
>>shouldn't change this around so that the configuration is put on
>>the title attribute instead?
>>The only disadvantage I see is that without clearing the title
>>attribute after fetching the data from it would leave the tooltip
>>with totally un-tooltip-like data (it would be something like
>>title="C:foobar:40:MO:50:50" for instance).
>My reservation with this is that it precludes valid use of the title
>attribute. Plus, in no way is your data block a title.
The TITLE attribute is more for descriptions than titles anyway...
although I would agree it is to some extent a misuse of said
attribute, would not using CLASS be more so?
Ultimately I would really recommend nesting invisible XOXO data or
something, but that's a matter of opinion.
>to argue that it's a classification, but if you squint it's more a
>classification than a title. The possibility of a user-agent
>rendering this data (which is entirely possible) is rather too much
>So I'd say keep it in the class, but make it play nice.
>microformats-discuss mailing list
>microformats-discuss at microformats.org
Stephen Paul Weber a.k.a. Singpolyma
MSN/GTalk/Jabber : singpolyma at gmail.com
ICQ/AIM : 103-332-966
TechBlog - http://singpolyma-tech.blogspot.com/
Personal Blog - http://singpolyma.blogspot.com/
More information about the microformats-discuss