[uf-discuss] eRDF <=> microformats?

Dr. Ernie Prabhakar drernie at opendarwin.org
Wed May 31 10:09:14 PDT 2006

Hi all,

I apologize if this might be off-topic, but I'm honestly curious and  
would like to understand this better:


(+) follows the microformats principles


 From my admittedly naive perspective, eRDF looks like it *could* be  
used in a way that is compatible with microformats.  That is, not  
*all* eRDF schemas and documents *are* necessarily microformats, but  
many of them _could_ be.  Conversely, it seems like _most_  
microformats could be described using eRDF schemas.

Is that true?  If so, what is the dividing line?

-- Ernie P.

P.S.  For what its worth, this seems _way_ more promising to me than  

Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D. <drernie at opendarwin.org>
Ex-Physicist, Marketing Weenie, and Dilettante Hacker
Probe-Hacker blog: http://www.opendarwin.org/~drernie/

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list