[uf-discuss] eRDF <=> microformats?
Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
drernie at opendarwin.org
Wed May 31 10:09:14 PDT 2006
I apologize if this might be off-topic, but I'm honestly curious and
would like to understand this better:
(+) follows the microformats principles
From my admittedly naive perspective, eRDF looks like it *could* be
used in a way that is compatible with microformats. That is, not
*all* eRDF schemas and documents *are* necessarily microformats, but
many of them _could_ be. Conversely, it seems like _most_
microformats could be described using eRDF schemas.
Is that true? If so, what is the dividing line?
-- Ernie P.
P.S. For what its worth, this seems _way_ more promising to me than
Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D. <drernie at opendarwin.org>
Ex-Physicist, Marketing Weenie, and Dilettante Hacker
Probe-Hacker blog: http://www.opendarwin.org/~drernie/
More information about the microformats-discuss