[uf-discuss] hCalendar spec- no specification included!
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Thu Nov 16 15:25:23 PST 2006
In message <C17F7BB7.8011B%tantek at cs.stanford.edu>, Tantek Çelik
<tantek at cs.stanford.edu> writes
>>>>>>>didn't list the hCalendar
>>>>>>> fields, let alone say which are mandatory and which are optional!
>hCalendar issues may be added to this page:
And they may be raised on this mailing list; and were, on 16 October
(that's one month ago, today).
>As cited, there are objections to rewriting/reorganizing fairly
>established spec pages without discussion and at least a reasonable
>resemblance of consensus.
If there is no consensus as to what the hCalendar fields are, and which
are mandatory, what are we doing here?
>The key with edits on the wiki, as with any wiki or source control
>system, is small contained edits that solve exactly the problem they
>are meant to solve, and no more.
1. You're either presenting your opinion as fact, again; or simply
2. Such edits were made:
and were reverted by you.
One month on, the issues raised in my original post are unaddressed.
Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
More information about the microformats-discuss