Software Projects Description Re: [uf-discuss] Potential Microformats

Bruce D'Arcus bdarcus.lists at
Thu Oct 5 19:09:57 PDT 2006

On 10/5/06, Tantek Çelik <tantek at> wrote:

> <snip>
> > I didn't follow process, though I do believe some of
> > the key prerequisites have been fulfilled.
> This is the key.  Just taking an existing format and translating them to
> class names is not enough - as the folks working on citations will tell you.

I don't think the domains are equivalent though. Citation metadata
covers a whole lot of ground (basically everything referenced on
Wikipedia), and  has a long legacy. Not so with project descriptions,
and I think DOAP is pretty much the only game in town there (and
really well designed).


More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list