[uf-discuss] hCalendar spec- no specification included!
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wed Oct 18 14:40:30 PDT 2006
In message <000e01c6f2f5$e658b3c0$0702a8c0 at Guides.local>, Mike Schinkel
<mikeschinkel at gmail.com> writes
>>> I don't think anyone has said that. I certainly don't think people should
>be encouraged to begin authoring before first understanding what the
>are nad are not "allowed" to do (unless by "authoring" you mean "fill
>in a form and let a machine do the authoring for you")
>A form would be nice,
It might be; note that I wasn't calling for one.
> but it takes time to develop and we can't expect they will be
>developed before people are interested.
We can't expect people to use something for which there is no spec!
>This is just like Creative Commons where they have the human readable
>license and then you can see the lawyese if you really want. I've never
>even looked at the lawyered one, have you?
> I don't need to; the simple version works much better for me and is
>all I need. Something that tells the average Joe how to author in
>simple language with good examples is what will be most beneficial for
Agreed. Did I say otherwise?
>>> Reasonable, but it needs some content, so as not to appear dry and
>Not to be contrary, but see "How Users Read on the Web."
> Content for content sake is less than useful.
Indeed. Did I ask for "content for content's sake"?
>>> Once they standard is set, the brainstorming (and related examples) is
>only of archival interest.
>Note that I said my list was just a set to start discussion
Note that I was discussing it.
>>> I note that your list does not include an explanation of Semantic
>Again, as I said, my list was just a set to start discussion...
Note that I wasn't criticising you for omitting it.
Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
More information about the microformats-discuss