[uf-discuss] hCalendar spec- no specification included!
bewest at gmail.com
Wed Oct 18 16:11:45 PDT 2006
> >I'm not sure this helps.
> I'm sure it does.
> >This essentially washes out the picture of two types of users.
> Perhaps; though it chiefly avoids the useless labelling of them. Or do
> you have evidence that "veteran experts" never look for new things, or
> "bleeding edge adapters" never fulfil obligations for above?
> For that matter, do you have evidence that "veteran experts" cannot also
> be "bleeding edge adapters"?
No need. No such claims were made.
> >My approach to this is to identify differences, although subtle,
> >between users in order to better understand what kinds of resources
> >would be most helpful.
> Then don't lump them together under stereotypical headings.
Huh? This doesn't make any sense.
> >I'm a little confused about what you are suggesting.
> I'm suggesting that there's no need for ageist (or any other form of
> unfounded-, and discriminatory-) stereotyping.
Now I'm more confused. No one claimed for such a need.
> >Can you elaborate?
> See my reply to the same post, by Justin Thorp, to which you were
There was no content in that post.
> >My current thoughts are that you meant either to say that
> >there is only one type of new user, or that the list proffered is
> Of the two, the latter is closer to the mark, but not very.
Then try building consensus or synthesizing new ideas. Otherwise this
is a tremendous waste of time. What actions should we take from your
"suggestion?" If we are ageist as you claim, then we desparately need
your help and guidance, not just accusations.
More information about the microformats-discuss