[uf-discuss] Unclear status of 'include-pattern'

[Andy Mabbett]

In message <C15C0074.7DD50%tantek at cs.stanford.edu>, Tantek Çelik
<tantek at cs.stanford.edu> writes

>On 10/18/06 3:56 PM, "Andy Mabbett" <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> As I noted on the Wiki a few hours ago, it's not clear, either from the
>> main Wiki page or include-pattern, whether the latter is an agreed
>> standard, a draft, or just a proposal.
>
>It is currently listed in the "Design Patterns" section on the wiki
>home page.
>
> http://microformats.org/wiki/

And as such, it's not  clear whether it is an agreed standard, a draft,
or just a proposal.

>It is also described/defined as "a pattern" in the opening paragraph:
>
> http://microformats.org/wiki/include-pattern

And as such, it's not  clear whether it is an agreed standard, a draft,
or just a proposal.

>>From that you may deduce that it is a "design pattern".

I didn't write that.

>Thanks,

What for? Constructive criticism that you once again dismiss out of
hand?
-- 
Andy Mabbett
                Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:  <http://www.no2id.net/>

                Free Our Data:  <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>