[uf-discuss] Unclear status of 'include-pattern'

[Ciaran McNulty]

Andy Mabbett wrote:
> >> As I noted on the Wiki a few hours ago, it's not clear, either from the
> >> main Wiki page or include-pattern, whether the latter is an agreed
> >> standard, a draft, or just a proposal.
> >
> >It is currently listed in the "Design Patterns" section on the wiki
> >home page.
>
> And as such, it's not  clear whether it is an agreed standard, a draft,
> or just a proposal.

It's none of the three things you mention, it's a fourth thing called
a design pattern, Tantek explained that here:

> > More specifically it is a design pattern that is included (so to speak ;) in
> > other proposals, drafts, and specs.

-Ciaran McNulty