[uf-discuss] hCalendar spec- no specification included!

[Benjamin West]

Mike,
But I'm so lazy.  Point taken, I'll include more URI's when I should.

Mike, your comments are under
<http://microformats.org/wiki/to-do#Information_Architecture>.

I did the hAtom creator and am interested in further work on the
creators.  <http://microformats.org/wiki/to-do#Creators>

If there is a creator missing, I'll gladly come up with something.

Ben

On 10/18/06, Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  See my todo list.
>
> Suggestion: can you be sure to include the actual URL of any referenced item
> in any emails to make sure I can actually find it. :)
>
> >> Do you think you can do a refinement of your categories on the to-do
> list?  Can you also enumerate the categories of content generally available
> on the wiki?
>
> Again, same comment...  And was this for me, or everyone?
>
> -Mike
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org
> [mailto:microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin
> West
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:24 PM
> To: Microformats Discuss
> Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] hCalendar spec- no specification included!
>
> > The point is there isn't necessarily one for a new spec. Until someone
> > builds one.
> No worries here.  I'm commited to doing this.  See my todo list.  Is there
> any that are missing?
>
> > So my point was I wouldn't see a generators/creators as the entry
> > point for a microformat, that's all.
>
> Ah, ok.
>
> Summary:
> * Support Scanning
> * Don't overwhelm with resources/text
> * Provide strong scents for where relevant information lives.
>
> > And sorry if I'm overstating that which everyone may already be agreeing
> on.
>
> Building consensus and making sure we understand one another isn't a waste
> of time.  But now that we all agree, let's please start taking notes and
> mentally sifting through everything.  Do you think you can do a refinement
> of your categories on the to-do list?  Can you also enumerate the categories
> of content generally available on the wiki?
>
> I'm thinking:
> * Advocacy of Best Practices
> ( Do we really want to do this? there are other places that do this)
> * FAQ
> ( Both general and specific to each format.  how do we present this?)
> * Spec Materials
> (Landing page, getting started, guides, and spec.)
>
> Can we somehow fit all the content on the wiki into these areas? Would it
> address the concerns on the wiki-feedback page?  Are there categories
> missing?
>
> Ben
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>