[uf-discuss] Unclear status of 'include-pattern'
davidjanes at blogmatrix.com
Thu Oct 19 12:42:55 PDT 2006
I responded to your immediately previous message by giving the list
the history of how the existing design patterns came into existence.
IMHO, I'm not sure if it's something crying out for, or would be
benefit from, more formality or process.
On 10/19/06, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> In message
> <21e523c20610191155k6e901f81o3bc4ba24beb12296 at mail.gmail.com>, David
> Janes <davidjanes at blogmatrix.com> writes
> >The initial design-patterns ... and I know because I wrote them ...
> >were distillations of existing practices. Include breaks this pattern
> >only slightly, but was a reasonable isolation of a unit of work from
> >hResume (I believe)
> Thank you, David, but I'm not clear what your point is here, in relation
> to the post you quote. Can you elaborate, please?
More information about the microformats-discuss