[uf-discuss] Microformats vs. CalDAV?
kmarks at technorati.com
Thu Oct 19 21:00:21 PDT 2006
On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> "The good news is Apple in on our board, which means CalDAV would
> be the
> standard we'd employ."
> CalDEV: http://ietf.osafoundation.org/caldav/
> Now, it's my understanding that one of the benefits of Microformats is
> it co-exists nicely with other standards, and often even augments them
> well. But I'm still new enough at this I didn't want to stumble in
> trying to
> explain and advocate Microformats to someone who thinks CalDAV is the
> thing they need to support.
I spoke to the CalDAV chaps at Apple about this, they have hCalendar
support as a ticket in their db:
More information about the microformats-discuss