[uf-discuss] Microformats vs. CalDAV?

Kevin Marks kmarks at technorati.com
Thu Oct 19 21:00:21 PDT 2006

On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:

>    "The good news is Apple in on our board, which means CalDAV would 
> be the
> standard we'd employ."
>    CalDEV: http://ietf.osafoundation.org/caldav/
> Now, it's my understanding that one of the benefits of Microformats is 
> that
> it co-exists nicely with other standards, and often even augments them 
> quite
> well. But I'm still new enough at this I didn't want to stumble in 
> trying to
> explain and advocate Microformats to someone who thinks CalDAV is the 
> only
> thing they need to support.

I spoke to the CalDAV chaps at Apple about this, they have hCalendar 
support as a ticket in their db:


More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list