[uf-discuss] Microformats vs. CalDAV?
mikeschinkel at gmail.com
Fri Oct 20 00:31:41 PDT 2006
>> I spoke to the CalDAV chaps at Apple about this, they have hCalendar
support as a ticket in their db:
From: microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org
[mailto:microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org] On Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 12:00 AM
To: Microformats Discuss
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats vs. CalDAV?
On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> "The good news is Apple in on our board, which means CalDAV would
> be the standard we'd employ."
> CalDEV: http://ietf.osafoundation.org/caldav/
> Now, it's my understanding that one of the benefits of Microformats is
> that it co-exists nicely with other standards, and often even augments
> them quite well. But I'm still new enough at this I didn't want to
> stumble in trying to explain and advocate Microformats to someone who
> thinks CalDAV is the only thing they need to support.
I spoke to the CalDAV chaps at Apple about this, they have hCalendar support
as a ticket in their db:
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-discuss