[uf-discuss] Social Media Group?
timber at lava.net
Thu Sep 14 17:23:26 PDT 2006
That seems pretty open to me. Restricting re-edits or undos is
*less* open. Plus, it's not like it's deleted forever -- it's still
there in the history.
And I don't appreciate the ad hominem there, either.
On Sep 14, 2006, at 2:17 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> I feel like I'm having to inform you of basics that you should already
> know, Colin. A wiki is the product of a long series of edits, with
> the end result the product of consensus reality. To say that anyone
> can edit is irrelevant, since anyone can also undo or re-edit.
> On 9/14/06, Colin Barrett <timber at lava.net> wrote:
>> On Sep 14, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
>> > I understand the process perfectly well, and even agree with
>> > of it. The wiki isn't open enough for my taste.
>> I have to admit, I'm a bit confused by that. How much more open can
>> you get than "anyone can edit"?
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-discuss