[uf-discuss] copy-and-paste metadata prior art?
chris.messina at gmail.com
Sat Sep 30 09:57:08 PDT 2006
A lawyer buddy of mine gave me these bits...
>> It is a patent application...not a patent.
>> The patent application: http://www.patentreader.com/pdf?num=20060218492
>> The patent application is assigned to Apple:
>> PAIR indicates it hasn't even been examined by the USPTO yet.
So no need to worry just yet, but we should watch this and contest it
On 9/30/06, Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/30/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian at gmail.com> wrote:
> > In Firefox, when I copy and paste text from other web pages to the
> > GMail compose Windows all the HTML markup get copied to. (The HTML
> > markup would be metadata.)
> Hmm .. interesting definitional questions about data vs. metadata.
> When GMail received that content, does it know how to extract the
> metadata? Or it essentially just a dumb past operation?
> FYI, the patent application has this as the primary claim (there are
> about 40 of them though):
> 1. A machine-implemented method comprising: receiving a command to
> copy or cut data from a source; in response to receiving the command
> to copy or cut the data, automatically collecting citation information
> associated with the data; and copying the data and the citation
> information into a copy buffer.
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
Citizen Provocateur &
Open Source Ambassador-at-Large
Cell: 412 225-1051
This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
More information about the microformats-discuss