andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Mon Jan 1 07:51:20 PST 2007
In message <5451E998-60F4-48C3-95C5-74D11F445A0B at lava.net>, Colin
Barrett <timber at lava.net> writes
>Tagging is probably a better uF for this, IMO. I like the idea, but
>someone pointed out (before the post on this list) that it's the wrong
>semantics for @rel. For the semantic web to go further, we really do
>need to respect the semantics established in standards documents.
I thought tagging was for tagging the current page, not labelling a link
to a second page.
How would you tag:
<a href="http://example.com/kitten.jpg">fluffy kitten</a>
and here's a
<a href="http://example.com/porn.jpg">pornographic nude</a>
Merry Bloomin' Christmas!
More information about the microformats-discuss