[uf-discuss] tagging in hCalendar & hCard
brian.suda at gmail.com
Wed Jan 3 02:25:59 PST 2007
On 1/1/07, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> The 'wiki' page on xFolk:
> "If you need to define tags as part of a more specialised
> format, rel="tag" is the recommended way to do so, and xFolk,
> hReview, hCard and hCalendar all do this."
> Yet there is no mention of this, that I can find, on any of the
> hCalendar pages.
> Is its application to hCalendar documented, somewhere? Indeed, is it
> true, or is it just wishful thinking?
--- the hCard wiki pages are more complete than the hCalendar ones.
Most of the hCalendar documentation has not been completed yet, so you
should not assume it is finished yet. The categories in hCalendar work
in a very similar fashion to the hCard, using rel="tag" along with
The presents of a rel="tag" attribute and value help parsers to
determine WHERE to extract the data from. (if this is a topic of
interest/confusion please email the dev-list)
> Similarly, the only reference to it on the hCard pages, seems to be:
> with no mention in the examples or on the cheat-sheet.
Which cheat-sheet are you talking about? the wiki, the PDF at
ilovejackdaniels.com or the one at suda.co.uk? We now have several to
choose from and keep uptodate and in sync.
If you are referring to the one at suda.co.uk, then which microformat
are you referring too? the hCalendar example DOES have a
class="category" and a rel="tag", but the hCald only has
class="category". According to the wiki, the rel="tag" portion "can
optionally be represented by tags with rel-tag", so the cheat sheet is
not incorrect, but at the moment only represents ONE way of encoding
I am open to suggestions on how to possibly represent the whole rel
attribute as optional, but again, the cheat sheet is not an "end-all
be-all" for representing microformats. It is a cheat sheet not a spec.
More information about the microformats-discuss