microformats at 200ok.com.au
Thu Jan 4 20:21:43 PST 2007
> Seeing the tag implementation on Operator has made me question the
> existing tagging standard. With wordpress you may get something like
> "?cat=13" for a tag or something that may not even be the intended tag
I find this quite frustrating too. I've expanded on my thoughts at
so I won't rehash it here.
I don't see a clear reason why ?tag=blah couldn't be an acceptable
format. I also think the standard should require parsers to match the
tag and the visible text (failure meaning the tag is rejected).
That would stop obvious abuse like <a
worksafe stuff</a> being indexed. That way your expectations based on
visible text would be addressed as well.
--- The future has arrived; it's just not
--- evenly distributed. - William Gibson
More information about the microformats-discuss