[uf-discuss] Problem with VoteLinks?
ryan at technorati.com
Thu Jun 7 17:55:55 PDT 2007
On Jun 7, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> The VoteLinks specification says that a VoteLink is used to (1)
> indicate agreement or disagreement with the resource indicated by
> and (2) the title attribute should be used to express a human-readable
> commentary (i.e., a rationale) for the vote.
> Brian and Ryan have shown that these two items of information are
> better expressed using hReview.
> Thus, it appears that VoteLinks is redundant at best, and in violation
> of the Microformat principles at worst, i.e., it hides rationale
> information - human information - in the title attribute.
You might be right that vote-links is redundant.
More information about the microformats-discuss