[uf-discuss] uF dumped in tag soup?
microformats at fatbusinessman.com
Mon Jun 18 03:26:08 PDT 2007
Ben Wiley Sittler wrote:
> i agree, but you should be aware that microformats are only specified
> to work in xhtml pages (so e.g. it needs parse as xml), not in html
Is this actually the case? The wiki seems to be a little ambiguous on
the topic, sometimes referring to “open microformat standards suitable
for embedding in (X)HTML…” and sometimes referring to “a 1:1
representation […] in semantic XHTML”.
Granted, the behaviour can’t be guaranteed in the case of a
non-compliant document, but are Microformats actually specified as
working in valid, but non-XML-compliant, HTML markup? Surely the only
requirement should be that the markup can be parsed unambiguously into a
(Hi everyone, by the way.)
More information about the microformats-discuss