[uf-discuss] hAtom - proposed move from draft to full spec
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wed Jun 27 12:10:22 PDT 2007
<21e770780704110249s547fe7d1gc2052464c1403a0a at mail.gmail.com>, Brian
Suda <brian.suda at gmail.com> writes
>Recently, there has been alot of discuss on the IRC about implementing
>hAtom in Operator. As long as there are outstanding issues and
>questions about how things work, then i don't consider the spec
>> Before moving to the specifications section, drop a note to
>> microformats-discuss and wait a day or two for major objections.
>> If none are forthcoming, move the microformat to the
>> specifications area. This move will wake up any sleeping
>> editors, and they may raise an objection and move you back to
>> draft. If you have followed the process, now is the time to pin
>> them down. At this juncture, any remaining issues should be easy
>> to resolve.
>> (Section quoted in full.)
>i'll try and get a full list of outstanding issues available. I
>believe that we need to flush out the test suite and compare several
>implementations. At the moment we have atleast 2 that i am aware of
>(maybe hKit too?).
>I think it is a matter for the Authors of the spec to suggest moving
>the spec from draft forward when they feel comfortable - maybe they
>are more aware of issues than others?
That was written in April; is there any news?
More information about the microformats-discuss