[uf-discuss] hAtom - proposed move from draft to full spec

[Andy Mabbett]

In message 
<21e770780704110249s547fe7d1gc2052464c1403a0a at mail.gmail.com>, Brian 
Suda <brian.suda at gmail.com> writes

>Recently, there has been alot of discuss on the IRC about implementing
>hAtom in Operator. As long as there are outstanding issues and
>questions about how things work, then i don't consider the spec
>"complete".
>
>>         Before moving to the specifications section, drop a note to
>>         microformats-discuss and wait a day or two for major objections.
>>         If none are forthcoming, move the microformat to the
>>         specifications area. This move will wake up any sleeping
>>         editors, and they may raise an objection and move you back to
>>         draft. If you have followed the process, now is the time to pin
>>         them down. At this juncture, any remaining issues should be easy
>>         to resolve.
>>
>> (Section quoted in full.)
>
>i'll try and get a full list of outstanding issues available. I
>believe that we need to flush out the test suite and compare several
>implementations. At the moment we have atleast 2 that i am aware of
>(maybe hKit too?).
>
>I think it is a matter for the Authors of the spec to suggest moving
>the spec from draft forward when they feel comfortable - maybe they
>are more aware of issues than others?

That was written in April; is there any news?

-- 
Andy Mabbett