[uf-discuss] Geo -proposed move from draft to full spec (was: Geo - why still draft)

Andy Mabbett andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wed Jun 27 12:14:09 PDT 2007

In message <J89oGvFLsiGGFwxz at pigsonthewing.org.uk>, Andy Mabbett 
<andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> writes

>In message
><cdc278e10704090426o1149bdedif552a21dccec98cf at mail.gmail.com>, Ciaran 
>McNulty <mail at ciaranmcnulty.com> writes
>>On 4/9/07, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>>> Why is "geo" still a draft, when it's included in the already-published
>>> hCard spec?
>>It's the idea of pulling the GEO out of hCard and making it usable on
>>its own that is a draft specification, I believe.
>>GEO and ADR as stand-alone microformats outside of hCard came later,
>>which is why they're at a less advanced stage than hCard.
>In that case, I think it satisfies the requirements, such as they are, 
>   <http://microformats.org/wiki/process#Specifications>
>and should be made a full specification. Any objections?

I wrote that on 9 April, and there have been no objections, What now?

Andy Mabbett

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list