hCard history and extensions (was Re: [uf-discuss] Date of
Death in hCard)
Tantek Ç elik
tantek at cs.stanford.edu
Thu Jun 28 11:54:49 PDT 2007
On 6/28/07 11:27 AM, "Benjamin West" <bewest at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/28/07, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>> In message <C2A93EEF.912A0%tantek at cs.stanford.edu>, Tantek Çelik
>> <tantek at cs.stanford.edu> writes
>>> For some of these I see quite a bit of utility (e.g. "gender" is often
>>> used in social network searches - an actual application in common use),
>>> whereas others seem to be merely driven by sense of semantic publishing
>>> completeness (e.g. date of death) and not by existing applications.
>> On the contrary; you have been presented with evidence *and* use cases
>> for date-of-death more than once; not least in the first post in this
> Andy, I'm not sure which evidence you are referring to. All I noticed was a
> a sum of google search results. We've previously discussed using search
> engine hits as evidence. Can you reiterate which URIs were surveyed along
> with an analysis of the markup used? It would go a long way towards providing
> evidence for this feature. How are people currently publishing dates of
> death? Who is doing it? Are there common authorship patterns?
And note I said: "an actual *application* in common use", e.g. people adding
contacts from the web into their address book is such an application.
As opposed to "semantic publishing completeness", that is, I grant that some
people are publishing some date of death information, but other than marking
it up, what do you do with the information? What *applications* are there?
E.g. for "gender" the widely used application is people search.
More information about the microformats-discuss