ernest.prabhakar at gmail.com
Fri Jun 29 10:20:48 PDT 2007
On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
> Tantek Çelik wrote:
>> Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that a bunch of us
>> decided to push the POSH name/moniker.
> POSH is indeed a very elegantly coined and catchy acronym, but the
> only problem is that it is more a procedure than a substantive - one
> cannot say "hRelease is a POSH" - and inevitably ends up being
> tempted to say "hRelease is a microformat".
Um, why can't you say "hRelease is POSH"?
-- ernie p.
More information about the microformats-discuss