[uf-discuss] hRelease

Montgomery, Mike MMontgomery at TerpSys.com
Fri Jun 29 10:40:05 PDT 2007

The way I read it, you cannot say "hRelease is a POSH" (with an emphasis on the "a").  hRelease is POSH but not "a" POSH.  POSH is descriptive not a "thing".

-----Original Message-----
From: microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org [mailto:microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org] On Behalf Of Ernest Prabhakar
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 1:21 PM
To: Microformats Discuss
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] hRelease


On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
> Tantek Çelik wrote:
>> Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that a bunch of us  
>> have
>> decided to push the POSH name/moniker.
> POSH is indeed a very elegantly coined and catchy acronym, but the  
> only problem is that it is more a procedure than a substantive - one  
> cannot say "hRelease is a POSH" - and inevitably ends up being  
> tempted to say "hRelease is a microformat".

Um, why can't you say "hRelease is POSH"?

-- ernie p.

microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss at microformats.org

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list