[uf-discuss] hRelease

Guillaume Lebleu gl at brixlogic.com
Fri Jun 29 11:34:40 PDT 2007

I don't want to beat this one too long, but I still think that the 
"what" is missing in "hRelease is POSH", which makes the use awkward in 
contexts such as a launch of something like "hRelease". Maybe the 
solution is simply to say "hRelease is a POSH specification" or 
"hRelease is a POSH format".


Ernest Prabhakar wrote:
> Guillaume,
> On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
>> Tantek Çelik wrote:
>>> Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that a bunch of us have
>>> decided to push the POSH name/moniker.
>> POSH is indeed a very elegantly coined and catchy acronym, but the 
>> only problem is that it is more a procedure than a substantive - one 
>> cannot say "hRelease is a POSH" - and inevitably ends up being 
>> tempted to say "hRelease is a microformat".
> Um, why can't you say "hRelease is POSH"?
> -- ernie p.
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list