[uf-discuss] Hatom or hcalendar?
chris at placenamehere.com
Fri Mar 23 04:41:40 PST 2007
On Mar 23, 2007, at 8:09 AM, Jeremy Keith wrote:
> But I'm not publishing an <address> already and isn't the whole
> idea of microformats that we don't change *what* we're publishing,
> just add more meaning to what we're already publishing?
> Of course, I can go ahead and add the hAtom classes anyway:
> But that's not a valid hAtom feed.
> I have to say that I find it a little weird that author is required
> but entry-title is not. Looking at the Atom spec, "title" is a
> required feed element and "author" is recommended. For hAtom,
> that's been inverted:
> This has probably been discussed before, right? If anybody has some
> URLs pointing to previous discussions of this issue, that'd be much
without touching on the core issues [way to early to think my way
through the docs] looking at the page, though sparse, it does strike
me that you are already posting URL, nick and potentially logo/photo
[if you consider it such] in the following markup:
<h1><a href="http://adactio.com/" accesskey="1" title="Home (access
key: 1)"><img src="images/logo.gif" alt="adactio" /></a></h1>
i'll leave you to decide how to best turn that into a vcard that that
can be associated with the hatom feed [but expanding the scope of the
hatom root node would avoid need for some things like use of the
nearest in parent fallback.
[ Chris Casciano ]
[ chris at placenamehere.com ] [ http://placenamehere.com ]
More information about the microformats-discuss