[uf-discuss] namespaces discussions off-topic
Andy Mabbett
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Tue May 1 15:51:25 PDT 2007
In message <C25CA3EB.8D4CB%tantek at cs.stanford.edu>, Tantek Çelik
<tantek at cs.stanford.edu> writes
>Namespaced **content** has failed because it encourages proprietary
>siloization of data, rather than interoperability. Namespaces perform
>a very different function in code (with different needs), despite the
>cosmetic similarities (use of ":" etc.).
I note that you've added a note to that effect, to the 'wiki':
<http://microformats.org/wiki?title=namespaces-considered-harmful&diff=next&oldid=16289>
but that you've overlooked point 3 in !"how to play":
If you write something opinionated, sign it with your username.
<http://microformats.org/wiki/how-to-play>
--
Andy Mabbett
* Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
* Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
* Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list