[uf-discuss] human readable date parsing
Patrick H. Lauke
redux at splintered.co.uk
Thu May 3 10:31:10 PDT 2007
Tantek Çelik wrote:
> To be clear, this clause, in the absolute, is undesirable. That is, in
> following the principles of microformats, the date needs to be at least
> somewhat *visible* to humans, rather than invisible.
But not the machine-readable part, if it makes no sense to the human reader.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list