[uf-discuss] human readable date parsing

victor jalencas victor at carotena.net
Thu May 3 10:48:29 PDT 2007

On 03/05/07, Patrick H. Lauke <redux at splintered.co.uk> wrote:
> Tantek Çelik wrote:
> > To be clear, this clause, in the absolute, is undesirable.  That is, in
> > following the principles of microformats, the date needs to be at least
> > somewhat *visible* to humans, rather than invisible.
> But not the machine-readable part, if it makes no sense to the human reader.

Exactly.  I was still referring to the machine readable format. I
don't think the human readable part causes many problems veing
visible, not even to the machine.

Victor Jalencas <victor at carotena.net>

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list